<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Room of One&#8217;s Own: do women need separate spaces to flourish?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/</link>
	<description>sex, truth and advertising.  tales of life online, digital and adland. Spitting truth bullets. If you&#039;re a lie, you&#039;d better duck. Warning: blog posts can be overly earnest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even social media experts make mistakes! &#124; Atomik Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-11336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Even social media experts make mistakes! &#124; Atomik Soapbox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-11336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for HotHouse &#8211; discovered to his surprise yesterday after asking Papworth to account for an inflamatory comment about the recent Digital Citizens event (Rhodie was one of the organisers). Instead of engaging in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for HotHouse &#8211; discovered to his surprise yesterday after asking Papworth to account for an inflamatory comment about the recent Digital Citizens event (Rhodie was one of the organisers). Instead of engaging in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even social media experts make mistakes! &#171; Digital Citizens</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Even social media experts make mistakes! &#171; Digital Citizens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for HotHouse &#8211; discovered to his surprise yesterday after asking Papworth to account for an inflamatory comment about the recent Digital Citizens event (Rhodie was one of the organisers). Instead of engaging in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for HotHouse &#8211; discovered to his surprise yesterday after asking Papworth to account for an inflamatory comment about the recent Digital Citizens event (Rhodie was one of the organisers). Instead of engaging in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Carruthers</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Carruthers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to quote a bloke in response, but Mark Twain seems appropriate: &quot;It were not best that we should all think alike; it is difference of opinion that makes horse races.&quot;

BTW interested in how something like Girl Geek Dinners fits into the model then?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to quote a bloke in response, but Mark Twain seems appropriate: &#8220;It were not best that we should all think alike; it is difference of opinion that makes horse races.&#8221;</p>
<p>BTW interested in how something like Girl Geek Dinners fits into the model then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Richardson</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Richardson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that Rebekah Horne&#039;s comment about women having to work 15 times harder than men to succeed in corporate life is the very reason why there should be spaces for women to get together to share their experiences and discuss issues that are specifically relevant to them. Obviously there is also room for these discussions in any group. 

I&#039;m interested that this grouping has caused so much consternation  and is seen as being so divisive, when I see it as a positive, empowering thing for women. 

Why is it any different to womens business networks or other similar groupings?

While women still get paid less than men for the same work, then gender is still an issue and not talking about it is not going to change things. But asking questions about it and working with both women and men for change might.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Rebekah Horne&#8217;s comment about women having to work 15 times harder than men to succeed in corporate life is the very reason why there should be spaces for women to get together to share their experiences and discuss issues that are specifically relevant to them. Obviously there is also room for these discussions in any group. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested that this grouping has caused so much consternation  and is seen as being so divisive, when I see it as a positive, empowering thing for women. </p>
<p>Why is it any different to womens business networks or other similar groupings?</p>
<p>While women still get paid less than men for the same work, then gender is still an issue and not talking about it is not going to change things. But asking questions about it and working with both women and men for change might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin English</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin English]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mia Jane wrote:
&quot;I do my best work alone. I like long distance relationships. I hate the “what are we going to do for dinner tonight” question. I like space. My best friend’s response to me was “is an entire ocean enough space for you Mia?” Sometimes not … &quot;

We have a lot in common :) Unfortunately for society in general and you in particular, the sentence &quot;If I were a man my space would be a given&quot; is still true. In my case, its a virtual space, but the point is still valid.

I don&#039;t believe that comparing what men and women accomplish should make allowance for the unequal conditions (in general) in which that work is done.  After all we are after &#039;results&#039; (whatever we define those to be - a painting, a poem, a computer program, a completed house, etc)).

HOWEVER, it does need to be recognised that innate talents come in all shapes and sizes (and BTW genders). In a formal sense, I&#039;m wasting resources to employ someone of gender x, who is a 90% fit to the job requirements, versus someone of gender Y who is a 95% fit.  One issue is that a lot of us (male AND female) have become so used to the world as it is that sub consciously we write the job description for a male dominated world anyway (and that&#039;s not counting those who STILL do that on purpose).

I would go so far as to say that corporations that discriminate in any form (except in favor of excellence) are failing their stake holders - in the case of corporations, this would include shareholders.

(and in Australia, this could impact your Superannuation, so you get THAT both ways, but thats another story)

Sorry for wasting space with a bit of a disjointed ramble (done quickly during a late lunch!!), with (probably) not much point.  Just saying there IS still a problem with gender discrimination - overtly or not - and that some of us guys recognise it as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mia Jane wrote:<br />
&#8220;I do my best work alone. I like long distance relationships. I hate the “what are we going to do for dinner tonight” question. I like space. My best friend’s response to me was “is an entire ocean enough space for you Mia?” Sometimes not … &#8221;</p>
<p>We have a lot in common <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Unfortunately for society in general and you in particular, the sentence &#8220;If I were a man my space would be a given&#8221; is still true. In my case, its a virtual space, but the point is still valid.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that comparing what men and women accomplish should make allowance for the unequal conditions (in general) in which that work is done.  After all we are after &#8216;results&#8217; (whatever we define those to be &#8211; a painting, a poem, a computer program, a completed house, etc)).</p>
<p>HOWEVER, it does need to be recognised that innate talents come in all shapes and sizes (and BTW genders). In a formal sense, I&#8217;m wasting resources to employ someone of gender x, who is a 90% fit to the job requirements, versus someone of gender Y who is a 95% fit.  One issue is that a lot of us (male AND female) have become so used to the world as it is that sub consciously we write the job description for a male dominated world anyway (and that&#8217;s not counting those who STILL do that on purpose).</p>
<p>I would go so far as to say that corporations that discriminate in any form (except in favor of excellence) are failing their stake holders &#8211; in the case of corporations, this would include shareholders.</p>
<p>(and in Australia, this could impact your Superannuation, so you get THAT both ways, but thats another story)</p>
<p>Sorry for wasting space with a bit of a disjointed ramble (done quickly during a late lunch!!), with (probably) not much point.  Just saying there IS still a problem with gender discrimination &#8211; overtly or not &#8211; and that some of us guys recognise it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;cerebral equivalent of the paralympics&quot; bit has been a bit of a debate in the chess world on and off. The introduction of the Women&#039;s World Chess Championship in the 1920s was seen as feminist and progressive at the time. But it tends to imply that women could not possibly compete intellectually in the &quot;real&quot; World Chess Championship. The introduction of the title Woman Grandmaster in 1977, which has significantly lower qualifications than the regular Grandmaster title does, doesn&#039;t improve the perception either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;cerebral equivalent of the paralympics&#8221; bit has been a bit of a debate in the chess world on and off. The introduction of the Women&#8217;s World Chess Championship in the 1920s was seen as feminist and progressive at the time. But it tends to imply that women could not possibly compete intellectually in the &#8220;real&#8221; World Chess Championship. The introduction of the title Woman Grandmaster in 1977, which has significantly lower qualifications than the regular Grandmaster title does, doesn&#8217;t improve the perception either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rhodie</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Rhodie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Laurel,

I&#039;m not sure where you here the rumours that the Social Media Women group were trashed at #DigiCitz however I heard nor saw no such thing. 

And if you are willing to publicly call out our event like that then you should at least have the common courtesy to name and shame these bullies especially when you have basically labelled our event &#039;poisonous&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Laurel,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you here the rumours that the Social Media Women group were trashed at #DigiCitz however I heard nor saw no such thing. </p>
<p>And if you are willing to publicly call out our event like that then you should at least have the common courtesy to name and shame these bullies especially when you have basically labelled our event &#8216;poisonous&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManBearPig</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ManBearPig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women don&#039;t need their own space, its okay to share, as long as there is a sanitary disposal bin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women don&#8217;t need their own space, its okay to share, as long as there is a sanitary disposal bin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurel Papworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a community perspective it&#039;s worth noting that as any social network gets large enough it &quot;forks&quot; - breaks down in to swarms, more manageable and meaningful numbers. Women and minority groups are just part of that &quot;forking&quot; into more relevant groups that share &quot;value&quot;. 

Consider for a moment if both groups had come together? And then doubled in size next time and the time after? 

Incidentally the history of Mambo/Joomla shows forking in open source developement and it&#039;s one reason why World of Warcraft is successful - the fracture lines of Alliance vs Horde, Guilds, PickUpGroups are built in subgroup technologies. 

Incidentally I heard that a number of women, myself included, were trashed by a couple of bullies at digicit. While I don&#039;t care if it&#039;s gender based or not (though I suspect it is), I can absolutely understand why women would want to stay away from that poison. We go where we share value systems...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a community perspective it&#8217;s worth noting that as any social network gets large enough it &#8220;forks&#8221; &#8211; breaks down in to swarms, more manageable and meaningful numbers. Women and minority groups are just part of that &#8220;forking&#8221; into more relevant groups that share &#8220;value&#8221;. </p>
<p>Consider for a moment if both groups had come together? And then doubled in size next time and the time after? </p>
<p>Incidentally the history of Mambo/Joomla shows forking in open source developement and it&#8217;s one reason why World of Warcraft is successful &#8211; the fracture lines of Alliance vs Horde, Guilds, PickUpGroups are built in subgroup technologies. </p>
<p>Incidentally I heard that a number of women, myself included, were trashed by a couple of bullies at digicit. While I don&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s gender based or not (though I suspect it is), I can absolutely understand why women would want to stay away from that poison. We go where we share value systems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewfro</title>
		<link>http://theyearofthecat.com/2010/03/15/a-room-of-ones-own-do-women-need-separate-spaces/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jewfro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearofthecat.com/?p=439#comment-292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Rebekah Horne&#039;s observation &quot;for women to succeed in this industry, they need to work fifteen times harder than their male counterparts,&quot; however that&#039;s because women have only 1/15 of the ability of men.

Ya know how you got all those hormones n shit flowing through you making you all irrational and emotional? That&#039;s not blokes&#039; fault. 

Harden up and show us ya tits!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rebekah Horne&#8217;s observation &#8220;for women to succeed in this industry, they need to work fifteen times harder than their male counterparts,&#8221; however that&#8217;s because women have only 1/15 of the ability of men.</p>
<p>Ya know how you got all those hormones n shit flowing through you making you all irrational and emotional? That&#8217;s not blokes&#8217; fault. </p>
<p>Harden up and show us ya tits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

