Archive | March, 2010

let’s all get butt naked and…pose: 10 things I learned from Spencer Tunick

30 Mar

In the wee small hours of March the first, I dragged myself out of bed and skipped down to Sydney Opera House to take part in an installation piece by Spencer Tunick, who was here in Australia thanks to Mardi Gras.

(N.B I’d advise you not to look too closely at the image to the right, as there’s a chance you may see someone you know).

It was an extraordinary experience, one that I am delighted to have taken part in, despite the sleep deprivation and gut-wrenching initial awkwardness.

Here’s what I learnt:

  • Clothes maketh the man and inform our interactions with him

We have yet to develop societal conventions for scenarios where we can’t take our cue from attire.  I encountered the feigned ‘why i didn’t notice you there’, the struggle to maintain eye contact,  the shoulder tap and (perhaps most absurdly) the high five.  On balance, it’s probably not likely to occur so often that we need a formalised set of social guidelines to greet acquaintances in the buff.  But it’s always interesting to put oneself through a science experiment and shake up your reliance on the arbitrary and the stuff you take for granted.

The last time I saw that many pale figures I was in Edinburgh. On a ghost tour.

  • And on that note, for an ostensibly multi-cultural city, there were an awful lot of honkys in the house.

Does this prove that Sydney lacks racial integration, or that getting naked in front of large amounts of strangers in the name of Art falls into the “stuff white people like” category?

  • People will do almost anything you ask them to if you’re wearing all black and barking orders through a megaphone.

From stripping off to lying stark naked on stone steps as dawn broke and the wind whistled through our…hair, to embracing a nude stranger in front of the national media, we obeyed blindly.  Milgram’s experiments had nothing on this. Imagine if Spencer Tunick chose to use his powers for evil…

  • Creating great art is not (always) a solo pursuit.

Mr Tunick, whilst an undeniably inspired and driven auteur has frankly abysmal communication skills.  For example, trying to position one or two naked people in a crowd of 5000 by yelling “That guy! You with the hair! Look to your left. No, that left!” is less effective than you might imagine.  But with a seemingly tireless team of assistants running hither and yon, sensing his meaning as much through intuition as anything else, order was restored and beauty was created.

  • Give credit where it’s due

Despite his dubious people skills, Tunick was the soul of generosity, thanking us as well as his team and acknowledging that they were the sine qua non of his work, seeming truly humbled by the end of the event.

  • Novelty quickly wears off

It was fascinating observing the shift – in myself and others – from standing awkwardly, covering ourselves with folded arms to an increased ease and freedom of movement.  Such hive-minded creatures are we that in the end, walking through the corridors of the Opera House between shoots with thousands of undressed people after I’d hurriedly bundled my clothes back on (it was chilly) I felt uncomfortable being clothed.

  • Art? Give us a knob joke any day of the week

During the last minutes of the shoot, Tunick seemed frustrated, demanding we contort ourselves in muscle-tearing poses for what seemed agonsingly long moments, over and over but never to his satisfaction. At a particularly tense moment during the shoot in the Concert Hall he snapped “face the organ!” to general hilarity. Ah, good times.

  • There’s always one…

You know how it is. There’s alway one man who starts waving his boner around, or a woman who does star jumps as the news helicopters fly overhead.  I suppose they just felt imprisoned by the puritanical, repressive nature of the event.

  • What a piece of work is a (wo)man!

Seeing 5000 people stripped of all signs of status, of personality, of the outward trappings we frequently strive for without pause or reflection was a genuinely moving sight.  How infinite in variation on a rather narrow theme we are.

As the shivering masses were shepherded back and forth, I was astonished at how vulnerable we all seemed, how ill-adapted to our environment.  At the mercy of nature and yet merciless in our subjection of it – but we go about our lives utterly unaware of the absurdity of that contradiction.

5000 naked apes huddling together for warmth against the glittering backdrop of a magnificent modern city was a sight I shan’t ever forget.

And for that, I thank you, Spencer Tunick and Sydney.

P.S. I’m currently in pre-production on a documentary about nudity, identity and notions of the self in both physical and virtual spaces. It’s exploring what happens to our sense of self online, (where nobody knows you’re a dog), or what changes when we’re naked.  If you’d like to take part, please contact me here.

A Room of One’s Own: do women need separate spaces to flourish?

15 Mar

Sometimes it’s tough to be both a professional and a person.

Virginia Woolf suggested every woman needed a room of her own to write. To do our best work, perhaps we need our own space.  Yeats said it was a choice between

…perfection of the life, or of the work,
And if it take the second must refuse
A heavenly mansion, raging in the dark

Last week was an interesting one in terms of the resurgence of feminist debate.  March 8th was International Women’s Day, a day of celebration for women’s achievements, yet containing the implicit assertion that the remaining 364 days belong to men.

I support the celebration of great achievements regardless of gender, and can’t help but feel that by setting separate awards, days and so on, we perpetuate the notion that women’s accomplishments can’t be ranked alongside those of their male counterparts.  How constructive is it to maintain the sense of women needing special or at least different treatment?

I have no argument with, for example, women and men entering separate sporting events; it’s obvious our physical capabilities are different (last I heard, there were no male entrants in the ‘giving birth’ sweepstakes).  But when it comes to the cerebral, I fail to see why women are obliged to compete in the intellectual equivalent of the Paralympics.

Unlike many of my peers, I’ve been proud to call myself the apparently now dirty word ‘feminist’ for as long as I’ve been aware of the concept.  I believe absolutely in feminism, as defined by the purity and clarity of thought of early feminists like Wollstonecraft, and uncluttered by the political infighting and schisms of later wave feminism. The most workable definition I can provide is:

the recognition that men and women do not receive fair or equal treatment as a result of their gender, and the desire to change that situation

Anyone wishing to quibble with the first clause need only refer to recent figures proving that salaries still differ hugely between women and their male counterparts.  Anyone wishing to quibble with the second is probably not someone I’m going to waste my time engaging with or trying to convert.

I’m a passionate supporter and member of Girl Geeks for the simple reason that women involved with technology are still in the minority. Anecdotally and from personal experience I know it can be tough to flourish and be recognised in an environment where you’re the odd (wo)man out.  But what’s really important to me is that both women and men are welcome at GGD functions and invited to contribute regardless of gender.

There’s something really wonderful about being in a group of like-minded women, and I’ve certainly found that such an environment can be more supportive than a mixed gender equivalent.  But that’s all the more reason not to cloister ourselves away, but to bring these ostensibly ‘female’ skills to bear on every environment, every interaction, to the point that sharing, listening respectfully and encouraging the more inhibited to contribute will simply be a part of everyone’s “how to be human” toolkit.

That’s why I can’t be fully supportive of Social Media Women, although I remain a huge fan of its creators, fabulous women all.  Hang out and talk shop with whomsoever you please, but I baulk at the association, through both my gender and profession, with an formalised organisation that actively discriminates, positively or not.

Digital Citizens (which I help to organise) held its first event last week - I’m obviously biased, but I think it went pretty well (and we scored a FourSquare Swarm badge – quite the high point for me..)

I wasn’t keeping score, but I think the number of participants and contributors was roughly equal in gender terms, and I certainly felt I could express my point of view and be heard doing so.

Rebekah Horne of MySpace said recently that

for women to succeed in this industry, they need to work fifteen times harder than their male counterparts.

If we want this situation to end within our lifetimes, the answer is to cease to recognise gender as a factor in our work and social lives.

Leave it at home; in your bedroom, your shower, your dungeon or wherever you like, but it doesn’t belong here.

What are words worth?

1 Mar

I idly suggested a few of my favourite words on Twitter the other day, and because i needed a mental health break from a very left brain sort of day, created a word cloud of the replies.

Isn’t language beautiful?

Thanks to Si Dawson, megsandbacon, ScottRhodie, mellalicious, KristianStupid and katrucia

Then serendipitously (also a favourite), Definatalie shared some of her rather lovely word art.

What’s your favourite word?  And what one word could you least do without?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.